Ripples Following Ripples ~ DRAWN
TO THE U.S. AGAIN
I
had to transit in Amsterdam, and arrived at Manchester
around noon, only to find that my bags had not come
on the same plane. Upon inquiry, I was told they would
come in on a later plane and be delivered to my home,
which is what happened. Another trip was over, but
a month later, I was on my way back to the US, flying
into Atlanta this time. It was so cold there, and
snowed quite a lot during my two weeks’ stay.
I expected it would be warmer in my next stop, Tampa,
but it was cold there, too. Nga and Lu invited me
to spend Christmas with them and their children and
grandchildren, although Christmas has no meaning to
me; I don’t even enjoy Buddhist festivals, preferring
quiet to noise and confusion.
Because I was unable to buy travel-insurance in England
for the U.S., I got it in Tampa, as it is too risky
to be there without insur-ance; it cost $935 for 6
months!
I arrived in L.A. on January 5th, and things soon
started to happen for me. I stayed in a large Vietnamese
temple near what is known as “Little Saigon,”
which has the largest concentration of Viet-namese
people outside Vietnam; it is about 50 kms south of
L.A. The temple was convenient for me, and the monks
and other people there were alright.
My first two talks that weekend were a bit ‘slow,’
but led ~ as things always do ~ to other things, and
then I really took off. In all, I gave 19 talks in
16 days there, and even if I say so myself, they were
probably some of the best I’ve ever given, though
this was due to the receptivity of the audiences.
Several places requested follow-up talks, and I was
happy to oblige.
The weather, in general, was quite good while I was
there ~ not as cold as in Tampa, and with only two
days of rain; it permitted me to take my early-morning
walks, which lasted usually an hour-and-a-half or
more. I felt good.
Needless to say, I met a lot of old friends and made
some new ones, and best of all, was able to locate
friends I’d lost contact with years ago, and
who I’d tried to find during my two previous
visits to L.A. One of them was Ping Kim Suor, the
Cambodian lady who I’ve mentioned several times
earlier. Anyway, this time, I got the number of a
Cambodian temple, and called the monk, Ven. Khong
Chean, who I’d met before. I asked if he knew
where Kim Suor was, and was very happy to hear him
say: “She’s here right now, working with
me!” She was as happy to hear my voice as I
was to hear hers. She was working in a mental-health
clinic, assisting the monk. It wasn’t long before
I went over to see her in the temple, and found her
looking extremely well. Her husband had died 6 years
before, and she was on her own again, but not unhappy.
In fact ~ would you believe it? ~ she said to me:
“I now realize that I lost nothing, but gained
everything!” She attended one of my talks a
few days later, in which I spoke about how I be-came
involved with the refugees. At the end of it, she
requested to be allowed to speak, and told how she
had met me. Her story was so moving, and everyone
listened very carefully. I asked for a copy of the
video-tape of it all, but when we eventually got it
several weeks later, it turned out to be unclear.
What a pity! I would love to have had it as a record.
Tinh Giac turned up in L.A. while I was there, staying
in a Tai-wanese temple. I saw quite a bit of him,
and even took him to visit Chi Phuong and her family,
as he’d known them in Bataan, too. He attended
my talks in several places.
In L.A., too, I met some Indonesian Buddhists, friends
of Onfat; one family had even driven down from Las
Vegas, where they lived. I’d met them in Jakarta
in ’97, and it was nice to see them there. They
invited me to visit them in Las Vegas.
I went on to San Jose by mini-bus instead of flying,
and had a nice time here, too, but with not so many
talks. I was quite busy checking all my books for
someone who had offered to set up a website for me
so that my books would be available to anyone through
the Internet. I was pleased about it, because someone
else, who offered to do it for me 18 months or more
before, had so far installed only one of my books
on it.
Now, last year, before I left England for Turkey,
there was a sore spot on the sole of my right foot,
and I thought I must have got a piece of glass or
something in it, but probe with a needle though I
did, I was unable to find anything. In San Jose, I
asked Dr Tuan to check it. He examined it and said
it was probably an ingrowing wart rather than a piece
of glass, and asked if I’d like it removed.
“Yes,” I said, “go ahead.”
He duly cauterised it, but it was so pain-ful afterwards,
that I became more concerned about it than be-fore.
He offered me pain-killers, but I told him I could
stand the pain; I just wanted to know what was causing
it.
After two weeks, my stay in San Jose came to an end,
and I flew out to Portland, where I’d never
been before. I spent a week in a Vietnamese temple,
but although things were not well-organized at first
(what else is new?) they got better as we went on,
and I ended up giving 5 talks, one after the other.
The first was a bit of a fiasco due to the poor translation
by a woman who argued with me, but the next was much
better, and the rest just went on from there, with
the audience requesting ‘one more,’ and
numbers in-creasing rather than decreasing, even on
week-nights. Many people asked me to return and stay
longer, and I would like to, but doubt that I will.
I met several people from Bataan who I didn’t
expect to meet. Even the monk-in-charge expressed
his appre-ciation of my visit, and that is rare!
It would have been good to have some books to distribute,
but the reprint of “BECAUSE I CARE” had
not arrived from K.L. and I was not pleased with the
printers as they had assured me they would be sent
off promptly. Only later did I hear from various people
across the country that they had arrived.
I was shown something of the environs of Portland,
and taken along the Columbia River and up snow-covered
Mt. Hood in a ski-lift. I heard someone say in surprise
upon seeing us: “What the hell!” so I
replied: “What’s the matter ~ have you
never seen yetis before?”
Then, from Portland, to Vancouver, where, once again,
due to personality-problems between some of the monks,
arrangements had been poorly-made, but it turned out
well ~ so well, in fact, that I even got the idea
of settling in Canada sometime; when I saw the paper-work
involved, however, this idea soon faded (I’d
forgotten how it was getting Aussie citizenship);
I’m allergic to paper-work. Thao took me to
Victoria on Vancouver Island; it was lovely there,
but so are the settings of Vancouver. I met a monk
who runs a monks’ training center, and visited
him there, and he invited me to stay anytime; well,
I fell in love with the place, built in log-cabin
style in the forest. It was really beautiful, and
so quiet and peaceful. I told them I’d come
and carve totem-poles there, and wasn’t joking;
it seemed a distinct possibility at the time, but
I don’t think it will happen now.
Victor was again in Vancouver at this time, in the
final stages of relocating from Manila. I met him
several times.
While I was in Vancouver, I felt the earthquake that
caused so much destruction in Seattle; it was quite
strong even there. Actu-ally, if things had gone according
to plans I made upon my return to the U.S. in December,
I could have been in Seattle at this time, but people
there didn’t bother to reply to me, and so I
didn’t go. Luckily, the quake didn’t cause
much loss of life.
After a week in Vancouver, I flew to Edmonton. Unfortunately,
it was cloudy, so visibility was poor and I saw nothing
of the Rock-ies this time. Coming into Edmonton, however,
there was very lit-tle snow, whereas I’d been
expecting a lot. I was received by quite a delegation,
led by the Taiwanese monk I’d met in the air-port
as I was leaving there last year, and who’d
invited me back to give talks in his temple. I had
requested just one or two people to meet me, as I
feel embarrassed by crowds, but they disre-garded
my wishes, and pressed bouquets on me.
I was surprised at how mild the weather was, with
temperatures just above freezing, although it felt
much warmer. They told me it had been 15 degrees below
the day before, but had decided to warm up for my
visit. Arriving at the temple (a converted second-floor
office), I could tell that people there were serious
and not frivolous, as the place was so orderly. The
monk was strict and seldom smiled, but people obviously
appreciated this, and he was good with me, and being
my junior in monk-hood, he treated me very respectfully,
and even assigned someone to be my atten-dant. This
man was too fussy over me, and I felt cramped. If
he learned that I liked something, he overdosed me
with it ~ curry, for example, and durian, which I
ended up getting with every meal, three times a day,
so that I became rather fed-up with it (something
I never thought would happen).
All this time, since San Jose, my foot was so painful
that I had to abandon my morning-walks. The day after
I got there, I had a dis-tinct limp. Investigating,
I noticed that the spot where the wart had been removed
was inflamed, so decided to prick it with a needle.
A lot of pus came out, and the next morning, it felt
better, but I went to see a doctor about it anyway,
and he put me on a course of antibiotics, which soon
cleared up the pus; the pain also sub-sided, and eventually
disappeared.
I gave 2 talks in the Vietnamese temple, and was introduced
by a young monk named Phap Hoa. I began,
and he then left the hall, to return only near the
end. He’d done the same thing the previ-ous
year, when Thien Tuong was giving a talk; since then,
Thien Tuong had died. Later, I wrote the following
letter to him:
Dear Phap Hoa,
there is something that I wished to tell you after
my second talk there, but the opportunity to do so
didn't present itself. I needed to tell you on your
own. Please understand that I am not saying it from
a desire to hurt you. I wish it weren’t necessary
to say it.
It concerns getting up and leaving the hall in the
middle of a Dharma-talk, as if you have better things
to do, or you do not need to listen, maybe thinking
that you know it all already. This is improper, and
causes a bad impression in other people observing
it. Maybe you do know it, but we should not listen
with minds al-ready made up.
Last year, when Thay Thien Tuong was there, you left
the hall during his talk and went to your room to
work on your computer; I heard your computer. I sat
beside him throughout his talk, to show solidarity
with him and give him moral support, even though I
did not understand what he was saying; he appreciated
this, and said so. I'm sure that you could have learned
something from him if you had stayed, but you have
lost that opportunity forever now.
This side of enlightenment, we all have pride; it
is a manifestation of the ego, of course. Humility,
on the other hand, is not some-thing we can practice
or do, but is a result of understanding; it must come,
and if it doesn't come, there is nothing we can do
to make it arise, but we should try not to show pride,
even though it is there.
It is a matter of respect for Dharma, not for the
speaker.
I didn’t expect to get a reply to this, so
was surprised when I did; moreover, he was humbly
apologetic.
Well, my 4 talks in the Chinese temple went very well,
and the translation ~ into Mandarin and Cantonese
~ was of a high stan-dard. After that, I was taken
to Calgary, in the south, for 3 talks there. These
also went well. While there, I was driven to the mountain-resort
of Banff in the Rockies. Although it was snow-bound,
it didn’t seem cold. We went into several luxury
hotels and up in a cable-car to view the surrounding
area; it was lovely. A visit to the city museum and
an elevator-ride up the telecom tower concluded our
sight-seeing in Calgary, and we returned to Edmonton
the next day for more talks there. These over, I flew
back to Vancouver, and the next day, out to Los Angeles.
As ex-pected, I was interrogated by an American Immigration
official at Vancouver airport, but finally got through.
I know they have a job to do, but why do they have
to be so rude while doing it? They almost treat people
coming in like criminals; does the law of the U.S.
consider people guilty until proved innocent?
I was met at L.A. airport by Quan, and spent 12 days
in his home. It was a quiet and uneventful stay, with
only one talk in the house of Ping Kim Suor, who had
called some friends to attend, and she translated
for me. I kept in touch with her by email now and
then.
Victor had also come to L.A. the day after I got there,
to stay with his eldest sister in her palatial home.
He took me out for lunch and dinner several times
at buffet places, where there is an amazing variety
of food, much of it suitable for vegetarians, and
cheap, too. Now, America is a country of overweight
people, and you can easily imagine that such places
attract them like flies, where you can eat as much
as you like for a set price (at that time about $7.50);
some of them are amazingly fat, and I didn’t
feel out of place there! There were even sugar-free
desserts, and so yours-truly availed himself; it’s
not often he has the opportunity for things like apple-pie
or cherry-pie.
Talks had been arranged in Las Vegas for me, when
suddenly, I got an email from someone in Chicago,
saying he’d be coming to Vegas and had booked
a helicopter to fly him and some friends over the
Grand Canyon. He invited me to join them, as there
was a spare seat. I hurriedly made plans to leave
L.A. a day earlier than planned, as this was an opportunity
too good to miss.
Taking a bus to Las Vegas, I went to stay with a family
who had set up talks in their home for me; not many
people came ~ just as I expected ~ but it was quite
good anyway; Las Vegas is, after all, a city of gamblers,
so I gambled with my talks, and succeeded in reaching
at least one person, an American woman who worked
with delinquent kids. It wasn't a waste of time, therefore.
I joined my friends on the helicopter flight on Saturday
morning. It lasted two hours, and was fantastic! We
set down in the Canyon itself for a picnic, and flew
over the Hoover Dam. I'm glad I went. Many thoughts
came into my mind and I felt I could write so much
about and because of it.
Over the next days, I was taken to visit the Hoover
Dam. We joined the long line to get in, and were taken
through it, descend-ing into its depths; it was incredible.
I was also taken through a casino-complex to a vast
restaurant, where the amount and vari-ety of food
was simply staggering, and the wastage nothing less
than criminal. Because the buffet-rate was so low,
people would load their plates up with far more than
they could eat, and if they didn’t like some
of it, simply leave it and go back for more; waiters
hovering nearby would then clear the tables of the
excess food.
Las Vegas is a city of illusion, to be sure, and people
go there to escape from the reality of everyday existence,
which they find boring, but there are many stages
to go through before we wake up; we do not become
enlightened in a short time. I saw a couple of entertaining
shows along the Strip at night: a battle between sailing-ships,
and an erupting volcano, both in the open and free.
The family from Indonesia picked me up and took me
to their place. They were trying to set up a restaurant,
but had problems with the contractor, who had reneged
on his agreement; they asked me to perform a blessing-ceremony
at the place, hoping this might unblock things, but
it didn’t, and eventually, they had to cut their
losses and get out. Our communication by email didn’t
last long after this; maybe they were disappointed
because I didn’t work the magic they desperately
wanted, but whenever I agree to do things like this
~ at people’s request ~ I make it quite clear
that I cannot guarantee any results.
I went on to Houston, expecting it to be much hotter
than Vegas, but in fact, it was almost cold! It was
raining when I got there, but it cleared up after
a day or two. The abbot asked me to stay there a long
time and I told him I would do so if he could keep
the weather like that! He laughed and said he would
lock it up!
Things went fine for me during the week I stayed there,
except for the translation of my talks, which was
mediocre, and when it’s like that, I feel quite
handicapped.
I went next to Dallas, and stayed for two weeks with
friends of Nga and Lu in Tampa; ~ Cu and
Thi ~ and they took me not just to any talks
that had been arranged for me in Dallas itself, but
also to places like Wichita in Kansas, and Austin
and San Antonio in Texas; we covered a lot of ground,
and it was rather tiring, but I enjoyed it all. Also,
taking advantage of Amanda’s offer of the previous
year, I had her fix some of my teeth, but they were
too far gone, and there wasn’t a lot she could
do.
The next stop was Miami, to stay with Hoa and Mai
again; they‘d requested me to spare a few days
with them after I had bypassed them in January. I’d
asked him in advance to do a biopsy on a spot on my
head which burned at times and which I feared might
be skin-cancer (I had one done in San Jose last year,
but it showed negative; however, I wanted a second
opinion,) but when I got there I found Hoa embroiled
in a law-suit, accused of mal-practice by an Indian
woman who had come to him with a swollen and painful
stomach, convinced she had cancer. When he opened
her, he found her ovaries consumed by T.B. and fused
to some other organs, and decided to remove them.
By doing so, he probably saved her life, but, seeing
an opportunity to dig gold, she took it differently
and sued him. Her lawyer tried to settle out of court,
but when Hoa refused and insisted on going through
the court, he threatened to take him not only for
the million dollars he is insured for, but for as
much of his assets as he could. Well, he was in court
for all the five days I was there and three days after,
and the case went against him, although the judge
was sympa-thetic to him, too, and understood his reasons
for doing what he did. He awarded the plaintiff $150,000
in damages, which was much less than they feared having
to pay. I had a nice rest in their beautiful waterfront
home, with no talks there, but didn’t mention
my biopsy; it would have been too selfish of me; so
I still have the spot on my head.
In Miami, I began sending out a Daily Thought to many
people on my mailing-list; I called them JATs
~ Just A Thought
~ and kept them up for two years or more, until I
felt it was enough, and stopped; few people asked
why, so obviously, it was time to stop; it wasn’t
always easy to come up with things for them anyway.
From Miami, I flew on to Washington D.C. and arrived
late at night, to be met, unexpectedly, by a small
delegation of people. Again, I stayed with Chau and
his family, and enjoyed being with them; I walked
every morning in the woods near their home, and sometimes
in the evening, too. Chau drove me to my talks and
wherever else I needed to go, including the meditation-centre
out in the mountains run by Rahula, who I mentioned
earlier. It was really good to meet him, a kindred
spirit. Even though he is a Theravada monk he is not
narrow and stiff as many Theravada monks are, but
friendly and relaxed, and of course, we had a lot
in common to talk about. He told me he had returned
to India in ’99 and had made a 700 mile trek
in the Himalayas lasting 10 weeks, and had also been
to Ajanta again, where he’d had quite an adventure:
one night, while meditating beside the waterfall that
over the past how-many-millennia has carved out a
huge basin in the gorge through which its water flows,
it started to rain heavily, and within two hours,
the waterfall changed to such a raging cata-ract that
the water-level rose 5.5 meters and came up to the
place where he was sitting in the darkness. It took
him so by sur-prise that his escape was cut off before
he knew it, and he was convinced he would die there,
but just as the water was almost up to his waist,
the rain stopped and then the water fell as rapidly
as it had risen. He said it was very interesting to
observe his thoughts during this event, and his readiness
to face his end in that place.
I told him that if I’d known him earlier I would
have accompanied him on his trip, and that if he decides
to go again, to let me know. Since then, we have exchanged
emails, and he invited me to stay at his place the
next time around (this time, I could spare only 3
hours with him, as I had to get back for a talk that
evening). I gave him a copy of “BECAUSE I CARE”
and he commented posi-tively on it, especially on
my views regarding vegetarianism.
Chau took me into Washington for a bit of sight-seeing
one day; I wanted to go up the Washington Monument,
but when we got there, it was closed for repairs.
Next we went to the Washington Cathedral, which was
built last century in the medieval Gothic style of
Europe; it was beautiful, and we spent several hours
there, and joined a couple of tours, so we could hear
lots of facts and stories and ask questions. Chau
had never been in such a place before, and probably
would never have gone in one by himself, so he enjoyed
it, too.
While in Virginia that time, I got an email
from an American who’d attended one of my talks
in a temple there. He asked why I didn’t feel
that Jesus was the way for me, and tried to prove
the validity of his beliefs by a long string of quotations
from the Bible. I re-plied and explained why I am
not a Christian and never will be. We exchanged several
emails, and when he saw he could not convince me,
he became rather upset and threatened me; this is
an extract from his final mail:
“Many of your simple questions have simple answers
which you could easily discover for yourself if you
had bothered to order the FREE materials from some
of the websites I pointed you to. If you are too lazy
to search for the truth for yourself, why should I
be bothered? Why do I care if yet another Yuppie is
determined to send himself to his richly deserved
eternal reward simply because he is too stubborn
to admit that he doesn't yet know every-thing and
that he cannot save himself?” (I bolded the
four words above.) In my reply to that, I told him
that he was welcome to be-lieve what he believes,
but should not try to impose his beliefs upon others.
I also reminded him who initiated this correspon-dence:
not me. I didn’t hear from him again.
I have long thought, and stated, that if
I get no further in this life, it will have been enough
to have escaped from Christianity. It is al-ready
a high degree of liberation. Now, why do I say this?
Let me quote from a book which I’d like to see
become required reading in all high-schools, “Insights
For the Age of Aquarius,” written by Gina
Cermina. Speaking about General Semantics
(GS) and its emphasis on Allness statements,
she says:
“Allness evaluations are often expressed
with terms like every, always, never, everybody,
all, nobody, and so forth. The state-ment,
‘Nobody knows everything about anything’
is in itself an All-ness statement. But it would
seem to be a legitimate or justifiable one, because
of the limitations of human sense equipment in
the presence of vast multi-leveled reality. There
are other types of justifiable Allness statements,
such as ‘All triangles have three sides
and three angles,’ which is true by mathematical
definition. ‘All the windows in this room
are closed,’ and ‘All the people on
this block have their garbage collected on Tuesdays’
could also be justifiable Allness statements”. |
Continuing, she says:
“Monastic orders, both Catholic and Buddhist,
have provided many disciplines for the deliberate
cultivation of humility. These include such activities
as fasting, begging, self-denial, menial work,
obedience, prayer, and meditation. Unfortunately,
such dis-ciplines are usually undertaken only
by that relatively small num-ber of people who
dedicate themselves completely to the reli-gious
life. “The lack of humility, commonly
known as pride or arrogance, and regarded as one
of the seven cardinal sins in Catholic theol-ogy,
can be manifested by people in many different
areas of their total being. There is the arrogance
of youth; of beauty; of health; of wealth; of
power; of prestige; of ancestry; of race; of fame;
of the intellect; even of psychic or spiritual
attainment. GS has no monastic disciplines and
does not provide specify correctives for all of
these arrogances. Life itself usually chastens
man, eventu-ally, in all of them. But GS does
have one specific antidote for the arrogance of
intellect, which is related to the arrogance of
knowl-edge or supposed knowledge. This antidote
is found primarily in the Non-Allness principle;
although as we’ll see later on, other GS
ideas also tend to counteract the poison.
“It is curious but true that some of
the very churches who en-courage the virtue of
humility in their flocks are sometimes the most
arrogant in their claim to a monopoly of religious
truth. Their followers then easily fall into the
habit of religious pride. They make many absolute
statements regarding matters that are diffi-cult
or impossible to prove ~ such as how and why the
world was created, the ultimate destiny of mankind,
the nature of God, what God wants or what God
did in the past or what God will do in the future.
They claim that God made the True Revelation only
to themselves or their predecessors, and to nobody
else before or since or elsewhere on the planet.
“In the same prideful category is the
belief that the Bible to which they give credence
is the Only Source of religious or spiritual truth.
A typical statement of this is to be found in
a tract of a fun-damentalist Christian group:
‘There is no book that is available to man
that is more beneficial than the Bible.’
In earlier ages, it was natural and almost inevitable
for people to believe in this way. Printing was
unknown, books were few, and the communities of
the world were isolated. But now such a belief
betrays lack of ac-quaintance with other great
scriptures and books of wisdom in the world. These
scriptures are currently available in a variety
of translations, and the books of wisdom are increasingly
to be found in inexpensive editions. It takes
only a little attentive read-ing to discover that
they contain profound and ennobling state-ments,
many of them very similar to those found in the
Christian Bible, and many of them clearer and
more appealing to certain temperaments, and therefore
more workable in their daily life.
“Also in the category of pride are 1) the
claim that mankind is the Lord’s Highest
Creation ~ a claim that is shockingly immodest,
completely unverifiable, highly unlikely, and
(in view of the end-less stupidities and villainies
of mankind) even downright blas-phemous; 2) the
claim that mankind is ‘God’s most
valued crea-tion’ ~ a claim which downgrades
all of nature and all other forms of sentient
life, and which has given justification to men
in Chris-tian countries to exploit nature without
conscience; 3) the claim that our particular ethnic
or religious group, of all the people on the planet,
was ‘specifically chosen’ by God ~
a claim which in the first years of the Space
Age has been hastily enlarged by some to the claim
that their particular group of all people in the
universe was ‘specially chosen
by God’; 4) the claim that only those who
accept Jesus will be ‘saved’ from
‘eternal damnation’ ~ a claim which
has seemed unbelievable to thinking Christians
for centuries”. |
I turned away from Christianity long before I read
the above, but it certainly backs me up.
I said goodbye to Chau and others in Virginia, I went
next to Chicago on May 1st. It was quite hot when
I first got there but cooled down considerably later
on and became quite pleasant. I spent a week there,
with only two talks there and one in Milwaukee on
Saturday; it was my first time back in Milwaukee since
my one-and-only visit there in ’85; I stayed
only long enough to give my talk and then returned
to Chicago.
The people in the temple in Chicago had not implemented
my last year’s suggestion to put up posters
with quotations in both lan-guages so that anyone
could read them instead of the walls being blank.
I've spoken and written about this for years. It's
really diffi-cult to motivate people, and sometimes
I think it's better to talk to stones, because although
the stones will not understand any-thing, neither
will they misunderstand, as people often do! Why didn't
I give up trying years ago?! It's hard work!
Wesak came and went, just like any other day (it also
happened to be the 29th anniversary of my ordination,
but that's not impor-tant; the important thing is
being human; being a monk comes later). I gave a talk
that day, and spoke about the destruction of the Buddha-images
in Afghanistan, using this to emphasize the fact that
there are far more than enough images in the world,
and that what is lacking is an understanding of Dharma.
The crazy Taleban presented us with a wonderful opportunity
to explain the significance and purpose of the Buddha-image;
nor is it only non-Buddhists who need to know this;
many Buddhists are ignorant about it, and are guilty
of what we are sometimes accused of: idolatry, or
mistaking the symbol for what it symbolizes. As far
as I could see, we missed that opportunity ~ dummies!
I left Chicago and went to Detroit, where I stayed
with someone I met there the year before ~ in fact,
the person who created my website for me. It was nice
staying there and I had plenty of time to myself.
I walked around the neighborhood in the early morning,
probably startling a few people; after all, it wasn’t
every day they saw someone so strangely garbed. Generally,
though, I wasn’t hassled in the U.S. during
those trips, as I sometimes was in ‘85.
Not many talks were arranged for me in Detroit ~ only
3 or 4 ~ but that was okay; I was winding down and
looking forward to having a long break in England;
of course, before then, there were still other places
to go.
From Detroit, there was no direct flight to Hartford
(my next stop), so I had to fly via Chicago, but because
of bad weather over Lake Michigan, the flight to Chicago
was delayed and I missed my con-nection to Hartford,
so had to be rerouted via Baltimore. Some people ~
one in particular ~ were quite annoyed at the inconven-ience.
I told myself there was no point in this, and actually,
was glad we came through the bad weather alright;
we might not have. For reasons like this, some years
back, I began to write thank-you cards to hand to
one of the air-hostesses as I deplaned ~ the Turkish
greeting-cards like those on the covers of “BOLEH
TAHAN” and “THIS, TOO, WILL PASS”
~ with the words: “To the Pilots and Crew of
Flight Number so-and-so: With Thanks and Appreciation
for a Safe Flight, from a Grateful Passenger.”
Sev-eral times, one of the flight-attendants came
up to me while I was waiting for my bags at the carousel
and thanked me for the card. It is a small thing to
do and can make some difference; everyone likes to
be appreciated, and flight-attendants must sometimes
deal with difficult people.
Arriving in Hartford around 8 pm instead of 11:45
am, I found that my bags had not come in on my plane,
but was told they would be delivered to me as soon
as they came. I called Eunice and Truc, and they came
to get me; needless to say, I was tired, but I soon
bounce back and don’t suffer much from jet-lag.
Fortu-nately, my bags were delivered intact that night,
around 1:00 am.
I had a pleasant time in Hartford with my friends,
and visited other friends there and in Boston, and
went to the temple, on the eve of my departure for
Canada, to participate in the weekly meditation-session
~ attended mainly by Westerners ~ and was requested
to give the talk afterwards. During it, I mentioned
that I’d been cor-responding with an Indian
follower of Sai Baba in Tennessee, and in one of his
emails, he had expressed the common idea that everything
happens for a purpose, the purpose being our spiritual
development. I replied that I don’t accept this
idea and find it quite egoistic, as it implies that
the universe is centered around and concerned about
oneself. I said that although everything happens because
of causes, it doesn’t mean that there is a purpose
to it all. It seems that it is my role to puncture
a few balloons as I go through life, but haven’t
I written that I am the ‘Devil’s Advocate’?
Sitting beside me was the young monk I’d met
in the Chinese temple the year before, and after my
talk he explained to me that he had to work in order
to support himself, and was finding this quite hard;
he asked me if I worked, and when I said yes, asked
what kind of work I did. I told him he’d just
seen me doing it.
I called Glen from Hartford to ask how she was, and
she told me that the father of Karin’s two children
had been found dead of a drug-overdose on his
father’s grave. Karin had broken up with him
a year before due to his drunkenness, but had gone
to the funeral, where his mother ignored her completely,
as if it was Karin who had caused it! Actually, his
mother used to say how much she hated him ~ her only
child ~ and had wanted to shoot him several times
herself; shortly before his death she’d called
Karin to tell her that he had been in jail four times
within the past year, one of them for ‘pushing
her around,’ which probably meant beating her
up. After his death, however, she changed her tune
and appeared very upset. Well, he’d gone, and
Karin certainly did not shed any tears for him. He
was a useless fellow ~ useless to others and useless
to himself ~ and wasted his life. I used to worry
that he would go to Glen’s and make trouble
there as he’d done before, even though Karin
was no longer living with Glen but had her own place,
about 10 minutes’ drive away.
Truc and Eunice drove me up to Montreal, where we
stayed in the home of Truc’s sister, and her
family was very kind to me. They took me to several
temples, although I’m not really inter-ested
in such. And Bi took time off work to drive me to
Ottowa, Canada’s capital about two hours’
drive from Montreal. I had never been there before
and found it very nice, although we had time for only
a short drive around as we’d stopped at an aeronau-tical
museum on the way in. I’d like to go again sometime.
Leaving Montreal by Air France for Paris on May 30th,
I had a feeling there would again be a problem with
my bags, which were checked through to Manchester.
The 6½ -hour flight to Paris was uneventful,
but Charles De Gaul airport was confusing, and it
took me a while to get to the terminal and check-in
counter that I needed; maybe the efficiency of the
U.S. had spoiled me; it’s quite easy to get
around airports there. The next flight ~ of just over
an hour ~ was with Cathay Pacific, the HK-based airline,
and I was pleasantly greeted by the cabin-crew, some
of them Chinese and some Thai. I was fascinated by
the south coast of England and the white cliffs of
Dover; it brought back memories, as this is the point
from where I used to make my forays into Europe in
the ‘Sixties, when plane-travel wasn’t
an option. We flew right over London, too, and I saw
the Millennium Dome far below, but soon after, clouds
obscured the view. There was quite a bit of turbulence
as we neared Manchester, but we landed al-right, and
I was soon at the carousel waiting for my bags, which,
alas, didn’t come; the feeling I’d had
in Montreal was vindicated. The girl at the appropriate
counter was apologetic and assured me that they would
get them to me as soon as they arrived on another
flight from Paris, where apparently, there had been
some delay in getting them onto my flight.
Glen and Karin, and her two kids, Chelsea
and Lloyd, were there to meet me and were surprised
at how little baggage I had ~ just my computer and
another small bag ~ until I told them what had happened.
Anyway, I called the airport to see if they had any
up-date on my missing bags, but they didn’t
and so I called again several hours later, to be told
they would be coming in on another flight that evening.
Around 8 o’clock, they called to say that my
bags had arrived and would be delivered within an
hour, which they were, intact and nothing missing;
that was a relief, as all my gifts, apart from my
clothes, medication and almost everything else I own,
were in these bags. It was my intention, at this point,
to return to Montreal at the end of September, and
make yet an-other trip in the U.S., but things happened
to change that idea.
I was soon busy with my tasks there, but the weather
wasn’t very good, with frequent rain-showers,
so it was difficult to get things done. It was June
and supposed to be summer, but it was cold and windy.
The first job I started on was the carport roof. At
first, we expected to just change the PVC sheeting,
but because there was not much of a slope on the roof,
we decided to raise one end of it, thus creating a
steeper incline. After two weeks, it was just about
finished, with a sigh of relief on my part.
One day, the phone rang, and the voice of an old man
asked to speak to Mrs. Bayley. I said “She’s
not here right now. May I take a message?” He
said: “Just say her twin-brother called.”
I was a bit surprised, as I’d not heard his
voice since 1970, and didn’t recognize it; nor,
apparently, did he recognize mine, because when Glen
called him back the next day, and he asked who had
answered the phone, he could hardly believe it when
she told him it was me. There will be no reconciliation
between us; he didn’t come while I was there,
and I was glad he didn’t. He lives only 15 miles
away, but Glen said she hadn’t seen him since
her husband died 5 years before. Some twin!
A bright spot on a Sunday was a visit to what is known
there as a car-boot sale ~ kind of a flea-market (though
why they call them flea-markets, I’ve never
been able to discover; I’ve never seen any fleas
for sale). I used to go regularly, and come away with
all kinds of stuff, most of which I didn’t really
need, but it was so cheap that I couldn’t leave
it there; I should restrain myself from going, actually;
but I got some good books for almost nothing, and
some tools for my work, and it was fun! One of our
cousins took me, and we would go to three places in
succession. She’s five years older than me,
so is midway in age between Glen and I, not that that’s
important. She was always complaining about her husband
~ the second; she drove the first one nuts, and is
probably doing the same to this one; we never heard
his side of the story, but began to doubt the things
she told us ~ saying he never did anything, or if
he started something, never finished it; as a result,
their house was a dump and she was ashamed to let
anyone see it; we wanted to see what it was like,
but she refused our attempts to invite ourselves;
maybe it was like the Addams' house, and not surprisingly,
as she never spent any time there to do the housework,
but was always gallivanting somewhere, to this or
that market. Funnily enough, she always seemed to
have money for that, but was always crying poverty,
a trait that she no doubt got from her mum and dad,
who were very stingy. Apart from her, we didn't see
any other rellies.
She wore the most preposterous clothes ~ her long,
see-through skirts were almost as bad as her shorts
and sleeveless thingies. And her weird ideas ~ I really
don't know how she came up with them! One day, she
asked us if we knew where was the well that our stonemason
maternal grandfather had dug in a field near where
he used to live. She'd been looking for it, and, not
finding it, presumed it must be covered up, so was
wondering where she could get hold of a metal-detector
to facilitate her search, again supposing that it
was covered by a metal sheet or something. I wrote
about her and another cousin in one of my books, tracing
back our family-tree; I asked her if she would like
some cow-dung ~ of which we’d just had a load
~ to fertilize the roots). She was hopeless at haggling
at the car-boot sales and asked us to do it for her;
I mean you don’t just pay the asking-price,
but have to haggle; you offer a lower price and can
always come up; usually you get things cheaper. Moreover,
she bought the most appalling rubbish; one time, she
bought a couple of rusty old hinges ~ huge things
that look as if they might have come from an old castle
or somewhere ~ for use on some gates that she dreamed
might one day get built up her drive, but which almost
certainly will not; paid a pound each for 'em, she
did, when they are the kind of things most people
would throw away; this was one of the times she bought
something on her own, without asking us to help her.
I usually took the dog out for a brisk early-morning
walk and she enjoyed it; we left around 4:30 and got
back 2 hours later; she was quite tired and thirsty
afterwards. She was a mongrel, with some pit-bull
in her, although she wasn’t aggressive. She
was terribly scared of fireworks, and almost every
Saturday night ~ and some other nights at random,
too ~ fireworks went off in the park not far away,
and then the dog scratched at the back door to get
in; on those nights we made exceptions and let her
sleep in the house instead of in the garage. Another
thing she was afraid of was anyone sneezing. I was
very fond of her, and she of me.
Around this time, an email from Anita told me that
her second daughter ~ only 15 years old ~ had left
home to live with her dad in Melbourne. His new wife
wasn’t very nice to the girl, however, so she
moved out and lived rough on the streets for a while
be-fore going to live with a boy she’d met,
and she was supporting them both by working part-time
in Macdonald’s or somewhere. This is what I
replied to Anita:
“Oh dear, bit of a bombshell you dropped on
me this morning! I'm so sorry to learn about Shanna;
what can have propelled her into this? It’s
little consolation to know that she's not alone in
the course she has taken; unfortunately, it's not
at all rare these days; you should hear the stories
of the young Vietnamese that I hear, and I hear them,
of course, because of my long involvement with the
Viets. But that doesn't help you in any way ~ doesn't
help anyone. I don't know what to say in the way of
advice or comfort; words are often hollow and cold.
“You are right in saying that help is useless
when it’s not wanted; it is as I say about Dharma
~ and you know that word, I guess: it is something
that must be not only needed but also wanted, and
if you give it when it is not wanted, it is rather
like giving a diamond to a dog! You must wait until
she's had enough of the hollow and empty life she’s
living ~ and it is so, I know; I've been there my-self
~ and realizes that the people she considers friends
are really not friends at all, and be there for her
when she turns her face for home; hopefully that will
be sooner rather than later.
“Meanwhile, you will suffer, of course, but
you can reduce this by reflecting on the uncertainties
of life and how it is a gamble from the moment we
are born until the time we die; every day involves
so many choices and risks; sometimes we win and sometimes
we lose, but we cannot just sit still like statues,
doing nothing; we have to do something. What a tremendous
gamble is marriage, as you found out by bitter experience;
and an even bigger gamble is begetting children, as
there’s no way of knowing what kind of kids
are going to come through; they cannot be ordered
to speci-fication, nor returned to the store for a
refund afterwards. My mum ~ your grandmother ~ used
to say that if she had her time all over again she
would not get married, adding: "But then, I would
not have had the joy I've had through my children."
Amaz-ing, I thought! I often wonder about the love
of a mother for her children: by all accounts (and
I cannot speak from personal ex-perience here), child-birth
is a painful thing; one would think once would be
enough, but few women stop with just one child and
willingly undergo the travails of giving birth again
and again. Can you throw some light on this mystery
for me?
“Yes, life is a gamble, but if people had not
gained more than they lost over the ages, the human
race would probably have be-come extinct by now. It
is up to us to try to find something positive in anything,
and it's amazing how we can do this if we step back
a little and view things from a distance instead of
standing with our nose up against a mural that covers
an entire wall, as it were.
“Suffering is like a gateway; there are few
people who come to an understanding of life by any
other way; how would we under-stand and commiserate
with others who suffer if we have not known it ourselves?
The word Compassion is very interesting etymologically;
it means: To suffer, or feel, with, and is therefore
a painful quality, yet there is none greater.
“Children are like water: the tap is the channel
through which it comes, but it does not belong to
the tap. And if one accepts the concept of karma,
one might see it all as a matter of causes and conditions
working themselves out, with no discernable beginning
or end. There is really no-one responsible for it
all, no-one in con-trol, no-one to blame.
“I saw something on TV the other night about
the collapse of Egypt's Old Kingdom, regarding which
there is still no consensus of opinion. It was claimed
that it was due to a global climate-change 4,200 years
ago that lasted several decades, causing drought and
widespread famine in Egypt; the Nile didn't flood
as normal, and maybe millions starved to death; cannibalism
was common, and people ate their own children in an
attempt to stay alive, just as they did thousands
of years later, in the thirteenth century. The program's
purpose was to illustrate the terrible ef-fects of
climate-change, against which we are almost impotent.
We spend a great deal of time trying to make ourselves
secure, but this is all illusion, as a tiny thing
can change the kaleidoscopic picture completely and
throw us into confusion and panic. The only thing
we can do is to accept the fact that life is insecure
and fragile, and trembles in the balance like a dew-drop
on a lotus-leaf, and inasmuch as we can do so, our
fear of the uncertainty and insecurity will diminish,
and thus we might find some security.
|